Speech Acts Used In The Film “ The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button”

Authors

  • Hendri Hendri Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v13i1.294

Keywords:

Speech acts, illocutionary acts, illocutionary force

Abstract

From the analysis, I found that the kinds of speech acts in dialogues of the film was dominated by directive speech acts, 340 times or 68%. The second speech act performed was commisive, 64 times or 13%. The third type of speech acts was expressive, 53 times or 11%. The last type of speech acts was representative, 42 times or 8%.. There was no declaration found in the dialogues of the film. Directive is attempt by the speaker to get the addresse to do something, it influnced by the status between the speaker and the hearer. Commisive commits the speaker to some future course of act. Representative commits the speaker to the truth of the expressed proposition, it also deals with the use of language to tell people how things are. Expressive is used to express our feeling and attitudes. In declarative, the person performing the act must have authority to do it, and must do it in appropriate circumstance and with appropriate actions. Students can learn from the film how people speak and how they perform an act by saying something and learn by using role-play. For learners, it is also an interesting thing watching film by observing the way people speak. At least it will give them inputs in terms of custom, behavior and also values hidden in the film.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hendri Hendri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Lecturer of Elementary Teacher Education

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

References

Austin, J.L. (1982). How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge: Harvard University
Bogdan, R.C. S.K. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative Reasearch in Education. London Allyn and Bacon.
Butt, David et.al. 2001. Using Functional Grammar: an Explore’s guide (second edition). Sydney: Macquire University.
Clark. H. 2002 Responding to indirect speech act. http://psychology.stanford.edu/~herb/1970s/Clark.responding.79.pd. ( 17 June 2009)
Cohen. R.P. and Perault. R. C 2009. Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts. http://pdf serve.informaworld.com.(17 July 2009).
Hurford, James R. And Heasley, Brendan. 1983. Semantics: A Course Book. New York: Cambridge University.
Thomas, J. 1996. Meaning and Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London and New York.
Kreidler, W.C. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London.

Leech, G. 1983. The Principle of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.
Levinson, C.S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyon’s, J. 1991. Semantic. London: Cambridge University Press.
Marmaridou, S.A. 2000. Pragmatic meaning and Cognition. Philedapia: John Benjamin Publishing. Co.
Richardson, Robert. 1996. Literature and Film. Canada: Indian University Press.
Searle, J.R. 1985. What Is Speech Acts?. London: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning Interaction: an Intro to Pragmatics. London: Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-01

How to Cite

Hendri, H. (2013). Speech Acts Used In The Film “ The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button”. Anterior Jurnal, 13(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v13i1.294