Determinasi Kejadian Perilaku Seksual Pranikah dalam Aktivitas Pacaran Remaja di Kalimantan Tengah

Determination of Premarital Sexual Behavior in Dating Activities of Adolescents in Central Kalimantan

Keywords: characteristics, determination, premarital sexual behavior

Abstract

Based on the 2017 IDHS survey, most adolescent women (80%) and men (84%) reported dating. The 15-17 years is the age group when adolescents start dating. Teenage dating activities lead to sexual behavior, such as holding hands, hugging, kissing lips, touching sensitive parts, and having sex. This study aims to determine the influence of the background characteristics of adolescents (age, area of residence, level of education) and social patterns (having friends having premarital sex, having the urge because of friends, influencing friends to have premarital sex, considering virginity important) on the incidence of premarital sex in Central Kalimantan 2017. Secondary data were obtained from the 2017 IDHS survey. Data analysis was performed by univariate, bivariate (Spearman rho test), and multivariate (logistic regression test). The results showed that 88% of respondents had sexual behavior orientation, and 12% did not. The correlation analysis explains a significant relationship between premarital sexual behavior and the area of residence. Respondents who live in cities are 3.47 times more likely to commit premarital sexual behavior (α<0,05 = 0,021; OR = 3.47). In addition, there is sufficient evidence to suggest a relationship between premarital sexual behavior and education level, respondents who attend high school and above are 2.71 times more likely to have premarital sexual behavior (α<0,10 = 0,066; OR = 2.71). Meanwhile, other variables from background characteristics and social patterns have no significant relationship/do not influence premarital sexual behavior. So it can be concluded that the background characteristics in the area of residence (Sig Wald <0.0) have a significant partial effect on adolescents' incidence of premarital sexual behavior in Central Kalimantan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6506a1.htm
2. Fhadila, K. (2017). Menyikapi perubahan perilaku remaja, Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia (JPGI), 2(2), 17–23.
3. Sarwono, S. W. (2011). Psikologi Remaja. Rajawali Pers.
4. Nasir, S., Suriah, & Evi. (2013). Perilaku Seksual Pada Remaja Yang Berpacaran Di SMA Negeri 2 Kairatu Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia (MKMI), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v9i4.463
5. Pinandari, A. W., Wilopo, S. A., & Ismail, D. (2015). Pendidikan Kesehatan Reproduksi Formal dan Hubungan Seksual Pranikah Remaja Indonesia. National Public Health Journal, 10(1), 44–50.
6. Desiningrum, & Sari. (2017). Pengalaman Berkeluarga Pada Wanita yang Menjalani Married by Accident Studi Fenomenologis Pernikahan Karena Kehamilan Diluar Nikah di Semarang. Jurnal Empati, 6(1), 338–345.
7. BKKBN. (2017). Survey Kesehatan Reproduksi Tentang Perilaku Remaja Berpacaran dengan Gaya Berpacaran. Puslitbang BKKBN. https://www.bkkbn.go.id/
8. Notoboro, & Magdalena. (2016). Pengaruh Aktivitas Seksual Pranikah, Ketaatan Beragama dan Sosial Ekonomi terhadap Kehamilan Remaja di Kecamatan Saptosari Gunungkidul. Jurnal Biometrika Dan Kependudukan, 5(1), 19–26.
9. Firza, F. (2011). Hubungan Antara Pengetahuan Remaja Tentang Pendidikan Seks Dengan Perilaku Seksual Pranikah Pada Remaja [UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/300819672.pdf
10. Winarti, Y., & Alamsyah, W. A. B. (2020). Hubungan Peran Orang Tua dengan Inisiasi Seks Pranikah pada Remaja di Prodi S1 Farmasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur. JURNAL DUNIA KESMAS, 9(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.33024/jdk.v9i3.3045
11. Swarjana, K. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. CV Andi Offset.
12. Notoatmodjo, S. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Rineka Cipta.
13. Hosmer, D. W. (2011). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14. Aisyah. (2013). Dampak Negatif Pergaulan Bebas Terhadap Generasi Muda Menurut Tinjauan Pendidikan Islam [Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin]. http://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/1228/1/AISYAH.pdf
15. Sudarsono. (1991). Kenakalan Generasi Muda. PT. Rineka Cipta.
16. Suidhan, A., Seweng, A., & Noor, N. B. (2014). Hubungan Pengetahuan Kesehatan Reproduksi Dengan Prilaku Seks Remaja Akhir Pada Mahasiswa Kesehatan Dan Non Kesehatan Di Kab. Mamuju Prov. Sulawesi Barat. 13.
17. Farida, F. (2009). Pergaulan Bebas dan Hamil Pranikah. Analisa, 16(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v16i1.64
18. Ivantarina, D., & Ratnawati, L. (2020). Characteristics of Mothers Which Affect The Low Coverage of Comprehensive Postpartum Service In The Working Area of Community Health Center of Kayen Kidul in Kediri Regency From January to August 2019. Jurnal Ners Dan Kebidanan Indonesia, 7(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.21927/jnki.2019.7(3).161-171
Published
2021-08-30
How to Cite
Citrariana, S., Paramawidhita, R. Y., Suryadini, H., Dawam, M., & Awumistiko, A. (2021). Determinasi Kejadian Perilaku Seksual Pranikah dalam Aktivitas Pacaran Remaja di Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Surya Medika (JSM), 7(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.33084/jsm.v7i1.2232

Most read articles by the same author(s)